miércoles, 23 de diciembre de 2009

La tableta de lectura no es la solución (dice Shafer)

El Gran Shafer sobre el futuro de las tabletas de lectura:
As publishers create tablet formats and iPhone apps, they vow they won't repeat the mistake they made with the Web by giving content away. But is $2.99 for an iPhone-optimized version of Esquire really the deal that you've been looking for? Not to take anything away from Esquire, but doesn't its iPhone app seem as vital as Newsweek on CD-ROM? Likewise, I wish Sports Illustrated's electrified version huge success, but I've got a couple of questions. Can the tablet version of SI really compete with the dozen channels of ESPN, Versus, and regional sports on my cable channel? If SI and Esquire are such hotbeds of tech and design creativity, why haven't I ever seen it on their Web sites? And if I were in the market for another video display (and I am!), would I pop $400 to $600 (or more!) for a battery-operated tablet, or would I buy a second HDTV (cheaper!) for my bedroom? Honey, make room for the new HDTV.

[…] In an interview, Pablo Boczkowski explain why the tabletized magazines may not take off. "A large fraction of the public doesn't read the news online as they did in print," he says. They're more interested in browsing, searching, linking, and interacting than they are in long, sustained intakes of information. "Put differently," he continues, "getting the news online is normally surfing, less often snorkeling, and very rarely scuba diving. Most people need a simple surfboard, rather than the complex—and costly—diving gear."

[…] Once the various tablet devices and smartphones collapse into super-ultralight PCs, the tablet-optimized publications will find themselves regarded by consumers as just another Web site, and the proprietors who thought they had a new, impregnable platform from which to sluice profits will be right back where they started—one site struggling against many.
A uno le parece que si todo esto es así… se hace más imperativo empezar a cobrar, y mucho, por el buen contenido. El que quiera calidad, que la pague. ¿Es negocio la información cara? Claro. Piensen en Nespresso. Queda para otro día.

Bonnier también va por la revistas-tableta en Paper Papers 17/12/09
La tableta de Time en Paper Papers 9/12/09

1 comentario:

GP dijo...

No leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan, no leen a McLuhan...